October 2024
Download PDFSeptember issue
Download PDFAugust 2024
Download PDFJuly 2024
Download PDFJune 2024 Issue
Download PDFIt takes decades for court cases to get finally settled. People of India take recourse to judiciary as a last resort and never as a first resort. They prefer to bet for other ways and means to get their issues resolved. This recourse often entails in taking to unlawful means also.
Secondly the cost of justice is beyond the reach of common man. It is very costly affair. More than the court fees the professional fees payable to advocates add to the woes of the litigants.
Around 3 crore cases are pending in all in all the courts beginning from a magistrate court to the Supreme Court of India.
There is acute shortage of judges. Around 18000 judges are manning these cases. The burden on judges could well be imagined.
The recommendation of the Law Commission of India, in the past, for increasing the judges` strength five folds of their existing strength has not been paid any heed to.
Irony is that none seems to be perturbed over the pathetic condition of the judiciary - the most important organ of the democracy.
None of the political parties ruling or opposition has ever made the judicial delay an issue in any election since Independence.
As such the the common man of India will have to come up and raise their voice
against this known evil prevalent in Judiciary
Total Civil Cases-----8824691
Total Criminal Cases-----22329150
Total Cases-----31153841
The Pillars Of Democracy
The horrific incident of the custodial deaths of the father and the son in Tamil Nadu are more conspicuous than any of the custodial deaths in the past in so much so that even the judicial magistrate appointed by the Madras High Court has himself explained the fearful and brazen atmosphere that exists in the police Station where the death took place and where noone was coming forward to cooperate in his fact finding task. The treatment meted out to the judicial magistrate is reminiscent of a similar incident which had taken place in Baroda in Gujarat in remote past wherein an SP (Superintendent of Police) had tied down a Magistrate with his chair and ill-treated him because the honest magistrate used to pass strictures on police for arresting innocent persons.
The custodial deaths have stirred and agitated the civil society once again. I wish at least the concerns this time too should not die down as business as usual as the Indians seem to be used to such occasional outbursts of emotions.Condemnations of the incident is not as wide and vocal as it wought to have been and are nowhere near the anger and anguish that we saw in US ( United States of America) over the brutal killing of George Floyd by the police there.
Now just let us have a view on how alarming proportion this disease called custodial death has been gaining in India.
A Google search reveals that:-
A total of 1,731 people died in custody in India during 2019. ... Of the 125 cases in police custody, 93 persons (74.4%) died due to alleged torture or foul play, while 24 (19.2%) died under suspicious circumstances.
1731 divided by 365 comes to 4.74 (say 5). This means 5 deaths are taking place daily on an average. Is it not alarming !
The very concept of police custody has inherent sanction of torture. Otherwise can anybody tell as to why are there the need for having police custodies when the more sophisticated judicial custodies are already there in place. Investigations can very well be conducted in a jails. Though I must admit that even jails are also not foolproof safer in this respect. Nevertheless the accused prefers jails (judicial remand) to police custody (police remand).
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in D.K. Basu Vs State of West Bengal, has laid down specific guidelines required to be followed while making arrests:
I. The police personnel carrying out the arrest and handling the interrogation of the arrestee should bear accurate, visible and clear identification and name tags with their designations. The particulars of all such police personnel who handle interrogation of the arrestee should bear accurate, visible and clear identification and name tags with
their designation. The particular of all such personnel who handle interrogation of the arrestee must be recorded in a register.
II. That the police officer carrying out the arrest shall prepare a memo of arrest at the time of arrest and such memo shall be attested by at least one witness, who may be either a member of the family of the arrestee or a respectable person of the locality from where the arrest is made. It shall also be counter signed by the arrestee and shall
contain the time and date of arrest.
III. A person who has been arrested or detained and is being held in custody in a police station or interrogation centre or other lock up, shall be entitled to have one friend or relative or other person known to him or having interest in his welfare being informed, as soon as practicable, thathe has been arrested and is being detained at the particular place, unless the attesting witness of the memo of arrest is himself such a friend or a relative of the arrestee.
IV. The time, place of arrest and venue of custody of an arrestee must be notified by the police where the next friend or relative of the arrestee lives outside the district or town through the Legal Aids Organization in the District and the police station of the area concerned telegraphically within a period of 8 to 12 hours after the arrest.
V. The person arrested must be made aware of his right to have someone informed of his arrest or detention as soon as he is put under arrest or is detained.
VI. An entry must be made in the diary at the place of detention regarding the arrest of the person which shall also disclose the name of the next friend of the person who has been informed of the arrest and the names and particulars of the police officials in whose custody the arrestee is.
VII. The arrestee should, where he so request, be also examined at the time of his arrest and major and minor injuries, if any present on his /her body, must be recorded at that time. The Inspector Memo' must be signed both by the arrestee and the police officer effecting the arrest and its copy provided to the arrestee.
VIII. The arrestee should be subjected to medical examination by the trained doctor every 48 hours during his detention In custody by a doctor on the panel of approved doctor appointed by Director, Health Services of the concerned State or Union Territory, Director, Health Services should prepare such a panel for all Tehsils and Districts as
well.
IX. Copies of all the documents including the memo of arrest, referred to above, should be sent to the Magistrate for his record.
X. The arrestee may be permitted to meet his lawyer during interrogation, though not throughout the interrogation.
XI. A police control room should be provided at all district and State headquarters where information regarding the arrest and the place of custody of the arrestee shall be communicated by the officer causing the arrest, within 12 hours of effecting the arrest and at the police control room it should be displayed on a conspicuous notice board.
Now the need is proper implementation of the guidelines and more importantly a prompt action by the superior police officers or by the government against the erring police personnel . Quickest and stringent action is warranted in case of deaths taking place while accused persons are in their (police) custody.
The dilly dallying on the part of Tamil Nadu state government is quite clear and whatever action on its part is visibly taken is apparently due to intervention of Madras High Court .
Let us hope the saner counsel prevails and the measures are taken to prevent recurrence of such ghastly and gruesome killings which are scars on humanity.
Editor : Harishankar Upadhyay
Mobile: 9869435995
Email id: vote1957@gmail. Com